The debate over fairness in student evaluation systems has intensified due to new correction tools, digitized processes, and a paid exam review system.
While the official narrative claims "no student will be harmed," practice shows that only students with low scores pay to have their exams reviewed, while those with high scores are untouched.
This model imposes an economic barrier to educational justice, as exam reviews, crucial for correcting errors, require a fee, limiting access to those financially able.
